Skip to main content
· 2/24/2011

Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc.

Citations

  • 639 F.3d 1329
  • 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1974
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3545
  • 2011 WL 651791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving claim requiring “elon- gate member” in patent for balloon-expandable coronary stent
  • involving claim requiring “elon- gate member” in patent for balloon-expandable coronary stent
  • de- scribing “consistent[ ] and exclusive[ ]” use of a term in the specification as supporting a construction
  • “[D]ifferent terms or phrases in separate claims may be construed to cover the same subject matter where the written description and prosecution history indicate that such a reading is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Friedman, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.