Holmstrom v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here the case is of first import in this court, it should follow that view which it [concludes] is best expressed in the law.”
• “[W]here the case is of first import in this court, it should follow that view which it [concludes] is best expressed in the law.”
• “Ambiguity does not exist just because a claimant says so.”
• “Ambiguity does not exist just because a claimant says so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).