Holmstrom v. Kunis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that arguments must be supported by citations to authority and that arguments not properly presented in an appellant’s brief are forfeited
• providing that arguments must be supported by citations to authority and that arguments not properly presented in an appellant's brief are forfeited
• “A reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and coherent arguments presented; arguments inadequately presented on appeal are waived”
• “A reviewing court will not become an advocate for, as well as the judge of, points the appellant seeks to raise.”
• \A reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and coherent arguments presented; arguments inadequately presented on appeal are waived\
• “A reviewing court will not become an advocate for, as well as the judge of, points the appellant seeks to raise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).