Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/7/1991

Holmstrom v. Kunis

Citations

581 N.E.2d 877
221 Ill. App. 3d 317
163 Ill. Dec. 723
1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that arguments must be supported by citations to authority and that arguments not properly presented in an appellant’s brief are forfeited
providing that arguments must be supported by citations to authority and that arguments not properly presented in an appellant's brief are forfeited
“A reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and coherent arguments presented; arguments inadequately presented on appeal are waived”
“A reviewing court will not become an advocate for, as well as the judge of, points the appellant seeks to raise.”
\A reviewing court is entitled to have issues clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and coherent arguments presented; arguments inadequately presented on appeal are waived\
“A reviewing court will not become an advocate for, as well as the judge of, points the appellant seeks to raise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.