Holmes v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the general requirements for aiding and abetting liability under Colorado law in the context of aiding and abetting a fiduciary’s breach of trust
• “The gravamen of a claim of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty is the defendant’s ‘knowing participation’ in the fiduciary’s breach of trust----”
• “We perceive no reason why the tort of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty should not be recognized in a limited partnership situation.”
• “[Wjrongful intent is not necessary as the factfinder is required only to ‘find that the [defendant] knew of the breach of duty and participated in it’ ”
• attorney representing partnership was not thereby attorney for limited partner
• discussing aiding and abetting fraud under Colorado law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).