Holmes v. Tyson
Citations
- 147 Pa. 305
- 23 A. 564
- 1892 Pa. LEXIS 836
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Sale—Warranty.</p> <p>The naked averment of a fact is neither a warranty of itself, nor evidence of it.</p> <p>At the time the sale of a horse was closed plaintiff said to defendant “I have nothing to show that you warrant this horse as you represent Mm,” to which defendant replied: “ The horse is just the same as when you drove him on Monday.” Meld, that these words did not constitute a warranty and that the case' was properly withdrawn from the jury.</p>
Judges: Heydrick, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.