Skip to main content
· 1/25/1892

Holmes v. Tyson

Citations

  • 147 Pa. 305
  • 23 A. 564
  • 1892 Pa. LEXIS 836

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Sale—Warranty.</p> <p>The naked averment of a fact is neither a warranty of itself, nor evidence of it.</p> <p>At the time the sale of a horse was closed plaintiff said to defendant “I have nothing to show that you warrant this horse as you represent Mm,” to which defendant replied: “ The horse is just the same as when you drove him on Monday.” Meld, that these words did not constitute a warranty and that the case' was properly withdrawn from the jury.</p>

Judges: Heydrick, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.