Holmes v. Turlington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where hearing officer found no impropriety in teacher's conduct and concluded that such conduct did not violate disciplinary rules, reviewing agency implicitly substituted its own finding of improper conduct in violation of section 120.57(1)(b)10
• whether there was a deviation from the required standard of conduct is not a conclusion of law, it is an ultimate finding of fact within the fact-finding discretion of the hearing officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).