Holmes v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not arbitrary or capricious for a special master to find an expert witness’ testimony unreliable when the testimony depended upon circular reasoning
• finding the special master did not abuse her discretion in evaluating and declining to give substantial weight to certain medical records
• “Absent epidemiological evidence to support causation, it remained the job of petitioner, not respondent, to supply a reputable medical scientific explanation of causation.”
• special master did not abuse discretion in evaluating opinions of treating physicians

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).