Skip to main content
· 7/7/2006

Holmes v. PHI Service Co.

Citations

  • 437 F. Supp. 2d 110
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45755
  • 2006 WL 1867834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the divergent approaches among members of our Court in determining whether or not a plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies is jurisdictional in nature
  • “[P]laintiffs receipt of the right-to-sue letter issued by the EEOC after her suit was filed ... cured her prior failure to exhaust her administrative remedies.”
  • “[A] 22 plaintiff’s failure to fulfill a non-jurisdictional exhaustion requirement need not be fatal to her claim”
  • “[A] court should not dismiss [a Title VII] claim [for failure to exhaust administrative remedies] if, after filing the complaint but before dismissal, the plaintiff receives a corresponding right-to-sue letter from the EEOC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.