· 7/7/2006
Holmes v. PHI Service Co.
Citations
- 437 F. Supp. 2d 110
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45755
- 2006 WL 1867834
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the divergent approaches among members of our Court in determining whether or not a plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies is jurisdictional in nature
- “[P]laintiffs receipt of the right-to-sue letter issued by the EEOC after her suit was filed ... cured her prior failure to exhaust her administrative remedies.”
- “[A] 22 plaintiff’s failure to fulfill a non-jurisdictional exhaustion requirement need not be fatal to her claim”
- “[A] court should not dismiss [a Title VII] claim [for failure to exhaust administrative remedies] if, after filing the complaint but before dismissal, the plaintiff receives a corresponding right-to-sue letter from the EEOC.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.