Skip to main content
· 6/29/1982

Holmes v. J. C. Penney Co.

Citations

  • 133 Cal. App. 3d 216
  • 183 Cal. Rptr. 777
  • 1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding dangers of pellet gun powered by C02 cartridges are generally known
  • “These acts countermand against finding that Penney’s has a duty to police purchasers who may be purchasing C02 cartridges to power pellet guns, absent actual knowledge that the purchaser so intends.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ashby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.