Skip to main content

Holmes v. Holmes

Citations

  • 467 Mass. 653
  • 6 N.E.3d 1062
  • 2014 WL 1282931
  • 2014 Mass. LEXIS 204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prior alimony statute “recognized only one category of postjudgment alimony, which the [alimony] reform act now classifies as ‘general term alimony’ ”
  • “we look first to the language of the relevant statute, which is generally the clearest window into the collective mind of the Legislature”
  • judge has discretion to reduce duration of alimony below presumptive maximum where temporary alimony has been paid for unusually long period of time or recipient spouse has unfairly delayed final resolution
  • statutory language is clearest indication of legislative intent
  • statutory language is clearest indication of legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.