Skip to main content

Holmes v. Grubman

Citations

  • 691 S.E.2d 196
  • 286 Ga. 636
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 330
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the same principles apply to both fraud and negligent misrepresentation cases and that the only real distinction between [the two claims] is the absence of the element of knowledge of the falsity of the information disclosed” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • applying Georgia law and imposing on holders “the burden of proving that the truth concealed by the defendant entered the marketplace, thereby precipitating a drop in the price of the security”
  • applying federal loss causation standard to securities fraud claims brought under Georgia law
  • “[T]he only real distinction between negligent misrepresentation and fraud is the absence of the element of knowledge of the falsity of the information disclosed.”
  • “[T]he only real distinction between negligent misrepresentation and fraud is the absence of the element of knowledge of the falsity of the information disclosed.”
  • “[T]he only real distinction between negligent misrepresentation and fraud is the absence of the element of knowledge of the falsity of the information disclosed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.