Holmes v. Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that EPA's failure to gather data can be arbitrary and capricious when the lack of data is \a problem of EPA's own making\
• finding that EPA acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it applied the wrong standard to its analysis
• affirming discretion of reviewing court to shape equitable remedy even when remanding decision to agency
• explaining what factors to consider in evaluating whether an agency decision is “arbitrary and capricious”
• A discharge permit imposes effluent limitations on a point source “based on how much technology is able to reduce the amount of a pollutant at issue”
• “We afford the agency’s decision greater deference regarding factual questions involving scientific matters in its area of technical expertise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).