Skip to main content
· 8/15/2013

Holmes v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc.

Citations

  • 966 F. Supp. 2d 925
  • 2013 WL 4456544
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Second Circuit has warned district courts not to provide defendants with an incentive to give priority treatment to putative class representatives in the hope of mooting their claims and thereby eliminating the class action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.