· 10/15/1884
Holmes v. Braidwood
Citations
- 82 Mo. 610
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must [have been] prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation omitted)
- “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must have been prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
- “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must [have been] prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation omitted)
- “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must have been prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Philips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.