Skip to main content
· 10/15/1884

Holmes v. Braidwood

Citations

  • 82 Mo. 610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must [have been] prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation omitted)
  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must have been prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)
  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must [have been] prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation omitted)
  • “For an error to require reversal on appeal, it must have been prejudicial to the party claiming it.” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Philips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.