Holmes v. AC & S, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Westinghouse, as a person acting under a federal officer, could remove a case under section 1442(a) after final judgment in the state trial court following Hadley-Memorial and Resolution Trust Corp. v. Allen, 16 F.3d 568 (4th Cir. 1994)
• discussing that removal to federal court suspends any subsequent state court proceedings
• “Once the notice of removal has been effectively filed in both courts, the federal court takes the case in the posture in which it departed the state court, treating everything done in the state court as if it had been done in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).