Holmes v. AC & S, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Westinghouse, as a person acting under a federal officer, could remove a case under section 1442(a) after final judgment in the state trial court following Hadley-Memorial and Resolution Trust Corp. v. Allen, 16 F.3d 568 (4th Cir. 1994)
• discussing that removal to federal court suspends any subsequent state court proceedings
• “Once the notice of removal has been effectively filed in both courts, the federal court takes the case in the posture in which it departed the state court, treating everything done in the state court as if it had been done in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A Welldog
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2021-01-29· cited 26×
• State v. HESS CORP.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-08-21· cited 23×
• Miami Herald Media Co. v. Fla. Dep't of Transp.
  N.D. Florida· 2018-10-05· cited 4×
• Aiken v. Waffle House, Inc.
  D. South Carolina· 2007-06-14· cited 3×
• An opinion was released in case 23-5091, Abram Harris v. U.S. Department of Transportation FMCSA
  D.C. Circuit· 2024-12-06· cited 3×
• Kozel v. Kozel
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-05-31

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 7,192×
• Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
  Supreme Court· 1908-11-16· cited 1,832×
• Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70
  Supreme Court· 1974-03-04· cited 1,462×
• Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1972-04-18· cited 445×
• Jefferson County v. Acker
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 428×
• Tennessee v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 383×
• Laura Kropelnicki, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hal Siegel, Linda Strumpf, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
  Second Circuit· 2002-05-08· cited 327×
• United States v. Kellogg (In Re West Texas Marketing Corp.)
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-01-31· cited 284×
• Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., Inc
  Supreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 281×
• Stone v. South Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1886-04-05· cited 238×
• William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., Appellee
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-05-17· cited 226×
• Gaines v. Fuentes
  Supreme Court· 1876-03-20· cited 191×
• Davis v. Mullins
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1996-01-12· cited 120×
• In re Diet Drugs
  Third Circuit· 2002-02-26· cited 120×
• R. Michael Butner v. Ingrid Neustadter
  Ninth Circuit· 1963-11-18· cited 118×
• Rook v. Rook
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1987-03-06· cited 114×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-07-16· cited 107×
• The State of South Carolina v. James Edward Moore
  Fourth Circuit· 1971-09-08· cited 69×
• Marie L. Hill v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1970-07-20· cited 67×
• Dorn v. Dorn
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1981-06-12· cited 58×