Holmes-Ramsey v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the District’s year-long delay in evaluating a disabled student and developing an IEP “amounted] to garden variety IDEA violations” that did not give rise to a Rehabilitation Act violation
• “[T]he Complaint’s omission of any factual allegations regarding the Officials indicates that the Officials were named 'as-defendants simply as another means of asserting'claims against the District of Columbia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).