Skip to main content
· 1/3/1961

Holmboe v. Muench

Citations

  • 12 A.D.2d 768
  • 210 N.Y.S.2d 818
  • 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he “significant limitation of use of a body function” does not require permanence, but instead requires a fact finding on the issue of whether the dysfunction is important enough to reach the level of significance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.