Skip to main content
· 12/6/2002

Holman v. Childersburg Bancorporation, Inc.

Citations

  • 852 So. 2d 691
  • 2002 Ala. LEXIS 354
  • 2002 WL 31731031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a]s a general rule, [i]f the proof of a promise or contract, void under the statute of frauds, is essential to maintain the action, there may be no recovery.” (citations omitted) (emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.