Holman Enterprises v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding an expert report where the court found it was “replete with legal conclusions and speculations”
• “[T]he net opinion rule is merely a restatement of the well-settled principle that an expert's bare conclusions are not admissible under [the fit requirement of] Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).