Skip to main content
· 7/3/1996

HOLLYWOOD LAKES CIVIC ASS'N v. Hollywood

Citations

  • 676 So. 2d 500
  • 1996 WL 364787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if attached exhibits negated the allegations of the complaint, the plain language of the attachment would control
  • “The ‘declaratory decree statute is no substitute for established procedure for review of final judgments or decrees. Nor is it a device for collateral attack upon them.’”
  • “The ‘declaratory decree statute is no substitute for established procedure for review of final judgments 7 or decrees. Nor is it a device for collateral attack upon them.’” (quoting deMarigny v. deMarigny, 43 So. 2d 442, 445 (Fla. 1949))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.