Skip to main content
· 10/29/1985

Hollymatic Corp. v. Holly Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 620 F. Supp. 1366
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a disparagement claim even though it did not allege “when, where, or by what means the alleged disparaging comments were communicated,” nor “by whom or to whom the comments were made, or, indeed what was said”
  • court considered contract attached to complaint and admissions in answer and in reply to counterclaim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Will

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.