Hollyanne Corporation v. Tft, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that advertisements may constitute offers to sell for purposes of § 271(a)
• explaining that the plaintiff had attempted “to base personal jurisdiction on one offer to donate and nothing more”
• holding that an offer to donate cannot be an offer to sell
• stating that the location of employees “is not as important a factor as it would be if they were not under the [party’s] control”
• explaining that venue and personal jurisdiction are coextensive in suits for patent infringement
• affirming dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction where plaintiff conceded that defendant did not sell or offer to sell accused products in the forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).