Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/8/2001
Holly v. State
Citations
- 18 P.3d 152
- 199 Ariz. 358
- 340 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
- 2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 16
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a charging lien (and its priority over a statutory setoff) arising from a contingency fee
- lien took priority over State's right to statutory setoffs for inmate costs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fidel, Ryan, Garbarino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Linder v. Lewis, Roca, Scoville & BeauchampArizona Supreme Court· 1958-12-17· cited 34×
- Gray v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-04-13· cited 22×
- Skarecky & Horenstein, P.A. v. 3605 North 36th Street Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-10· cited 10×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-02-25· cited 8×
- Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-26· cited 3×
- Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 2000-10-17· cited 3×
- Positive Progressions, LLC v. LandermanWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-10-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.