Skip to main content
· 3/13/1984

Holly v. Cannady

Citations

  • 669 S.W.2d 381
  • 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2291
  • 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 5192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Plaintiff “simply relies upon the broadcast itself, arguing that the internal inconsistencies therein necessarily prove a reckless disregard of its truth or falsity. We disagree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guittard, Allen, Rowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.