Skip to main content
· 10/29/1996

Holly-Anne Geier v. Medtronic, Inc. And David H. Roberts

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 238
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28283
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,355
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 249
  • 1996 WL 627733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant sued in his individual capacity is merely a supervisor and is not subject to Title VII liability
  • discounting evidence of bad intent that occurred a full year before the job action
  • discounting evidence of bad intent that occurred a full year before the adverse action
  • affirming summary judgment where long interval between a remark and the adverse action defeated an inference of a “causal nexus between the remark and decision to discharge”
  • discounting evidence of bad intent that occurred a full year before the adverse action
  • “[t]o be probative of discrimination,” supervisor comments must be “contemporaneous with the [adverse employment action] or causally related to [it]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.