Hollowell v. Career Decisions, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary judgment was appropriate where the plaintiff failed to offer any proof indicating that the value of the services she performed exceeded the compensation she received
• defendant-corporate officer \was entitled to a `qualified privilege' in the statement made at the board meeting regarding the performance of [the company]\
• “The essential elements of such a claim are (1) receipt of a benefit by the defendant from the plaintiff and (2) which benefit it is inequitable that the defendant retain”
• express consent where plaintiff herself “requested the very conversation which she alleges slandered her”
• “A communication regarding a person is absolutely privileged if it is consented to.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).