Holloway v. Conger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an untimely post- trial motion “does not toll time for appeal from, or affect the finality of, the original judgment”
• recognizing that a party may file a successive Rule 59 motion “when the court substantively alters its judgment in response to a Rule 59 motion”
• holding that Wages's attempt to file an amended complaint that did not differ materially from the one that failed to state a claim evidenced bad faith
• stating that \we have never recognized a constitutional violation arising from the collection of taxes\
• holding that pro se litigants may be 19 sanctioned under section 1927
• explaining that Section 1927 21 sanctions can be imposed against unrepresented litigants as well as attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).