Skip to main content

Holloman v. State

Citations

  • 2002 WY 117
  • 51 P.3d 214
  • 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 123
  • 2002 WL 1759754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding failure to give self-defense instruction reversible error because 8 one's intent, under the doctrine of transferred intent, carries the lack of criminal intent to the unintended consequences and thus precludes criminal responsibility
  • “The general rule is that if a person acting in necessary self-defense unintentionally injures or kills a third person, he is not guilty of homicide or assault and battery.”
  • “Under these alleged facts, we nevertheless believe that [defendant’s] testimony required that the jury be instructed on the law of self-defense. The jury’s role is to determine whether [his] intentional acts were self-defense . . . .”
  • “[I]f self-defense is justified against the intended victim and would excuse the assault or homicide of that victim, then the assault or homicide of the unintended victim is excused or justified, and no criminal conviction can be obtained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lehman, Golden, Hill, Kite, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.