Skip to main content
· 11/18/1898

Hollister v. Buchanan

Citations

  • 11 S.D. 280
  • 77 N.W. 103
  • 1898 S.D. LEXIS 113

Syllabus

<p>It is no defense to an action to recover a deficiency due ou a note after foreclosure of a mortgage securing the same that the property was pur- • chased at the sale at a price so inadequate as to work injustice, since the sale was not void, but voidable only, on direct motion of an interested party to set-it aside.</p> <p>Corson, P. J., dissenting.</p>

Judges: Corson, Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.