Skip to main content
· 3/13/1985

Hollis v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 165 Cal. App. 3d 642
  • 211 Cal. Rptr. 649
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • forcing joint trial of all four defendants within sixty-day period would place at risk the rights of three of them to adequate representation and a fair trial; therefore, continuance was necessary to protect right of co-defendants to adequate representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Puglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.