Skip to main content

Hollis v. State

Citations

  • 96 Nev. 207
  • 606 P.2d 534
  • 1980 Nev. LEXIS 552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holdingS instruction that jury \shall\ infer unlawfully entering person to have intended to commit larceny absent defendant's showing of lack of criminal intent was improper mandatory inference
  • where a jury instruction violated a statute, it was unnecessary to decide the constitutional claim because of the rule that “[t]his court will not consider constitutional issues which are not necessary to the determination of an appeal”
  • this court will not consider constitutional issues unnecessary to determination of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.