Hollis v. ROSA MEXICANO DC, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the standard for “the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress” “[i]n the District of Columbia” (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 (1965))
• determining a lack of subject matter jurisdiction over claims asserted in the complaint but not mentioned in the SF-95 at issue because “the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that she satisfied the FTCA’s administrative exhaustion requirements”
• dismissing IIED Claim where the plaintiff, an African-American woman, alleged that she attempted to secure a table at a restaurant, but was ignored, denied a reservation buzzer, and received “abusive responses” to her inquiries that were “abrasive and sharp-toned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).