Hollins v. United States Tennis Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that The International Tennis Federation’s “business is sanctioning and regulating tennis tournaments” and collecting similar cases
• finding that The International Tennis Federation’s “business is sanctioning and regulating tennis tournaments” and collecting similar cases
• finding plaintiffs made a sufficient showing of general jurisdiction under N.Y. CPLR § 301 to warrant discovery on the issue
• denying the motion to stay where the complaint alleged that the moving defendants would be important witnesses, thus, even if dismissed, those moving defendants would be subjected to discovery
• “[T]he Second Circuit has ordered jurisdictional discovery where plaintiffs allege more than eonclusory statements but without supporting facts”
• “[T]he Second Circuit has ordered jurisdictional discovery where plaintiffs allege more than conclusory statements but without supporting facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).