Skip to main content
· 11/17/1960

Hollins v. Jefferson Oil Co.

Citations

  • 124 So. 2d 629
  • 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to separate causation from the amount of loss “would frustrate the purpose of the appraisal”
  • “[C]au-sation and amount of loss are ‘so inextricably intertwined.’” (internal citation omitted)
  • appraisal process is “to ensure speedy and efficient resolution of claims”
  • rejecting a causation argument disguised as an issue of coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frugé, Hood, Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.