Skip to main content
· 3/9/1989

Hollingsworth v. Commercial Union Insurance

Citations

  • 208 Cal. App. 3d 800
  • 256 Cal. Rptr. 357
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • injury resulting from ear-piercing service by an employee of a cosmetics shop was held to be a \professional service\ even though not requiring extensive training or professional skill
  • applying exception to ear piercing done by retail cosmetic store

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arabian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.