Skip to main content
· 4/25/1995

Hollingshead v. Matsen

Citations

  • 34 Cal. App. 4th 525
  • 40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 603
  • 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1333
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3107
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that section 514 preemption applies to state misrepresentation claims against agent who allegedly solicited plaintiffs’ participation in ERISA plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.