Skip to main content
· 2/24/1966

Hollingbery v. Dunn

Citations

  • 411 P.2d 431
  • 68 Wash. 2d 75
  • 1966 Wash. LEXIS 705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether in a given situation, one is an employee or an independent contractor depends to a large degree upon the facts and circumstances of the transaction and the context in which they must be considered.”
  • “[W]here the facts 16 as to the agreement between the parties to the transaction are in dispute or are susceptible of more 17 than one interpretation or conclusion, then the relationship of the parties generally becomes a 18 question to be determined by the trier of the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.