Hollinbeck v. Downey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was foreseeable that a caddy was in “a place of danger” because “[i]t is common knowledge, even to nonplayers, that the force of a driven golf ball is intense”
• stating that ordinarily the question of whether a party has assumed the risks of a given situation is for the jury, but when the evidence is conclusive, it becomes a question of law for the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).