Holliman v. Carroll's Adm'rs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• regulation at issue, sensibly read, did not seek to deter harmless jokes, but well-known pejoratives unacceptable in the workplace
• persons of normal intelligence are capable of determining whether racial remark is “unwanted” or “imprudent”; due process does not require City to define such terms with “mathematical precision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).