Holliday v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The right of cross-examination has been limited only [in] clear cases of irrelevancy, trespass beyond admissible grounds, or extremes of continual aimless repetition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Havard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2001-07-31· cited 15×
• Dareadell Terrell Thompson v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-01-27· cited 8×
• Mayo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2004-05-11· cited 6×
• Jalen Shaquille Williams v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2019-04-02
• Sidney Bishop v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2019-07-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harper v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1985-10-16· cited 182×
• Gibson v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 67×
• Roberts v. Grafe Auto Co., Inc.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 63×
• Parker v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 19×