HOLLIDAY v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the Court found a reasonable excuse for a five-year delay and reversed a judgment of non pros
• both cases recognizing that Pa. R.C.P. No. 1037(a) does not work any fundamental change in the nature of the judgment entered pursuant thereto.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• LANSDOWNE BY LANSDOWNE v. GC Murphy Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-12· cited 14×
• Iole v. Western Auto Supply Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-12· cited 11×
• Kennedy v. BD. OF SUP'RS, WARMINSTER TP.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 11×
• Alston v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-28· cited 8×
• Broglie v. Union Township
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-23· cited 5×
• Novak v. Cohen
  Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1974-03-20
• Johnson v. Whisler
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1973-05-11
• Concord-Liberty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mooney
  Beaver County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-11-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBois
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-11-12· cited 126×
• Gallagher v. Jewish Hosp. Assn. of Phila.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-04-18· cited 65×
• Waring v. Pennsylvania Railroad
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-15· cited 44×
• Goldstein v. Graduate Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-07· cited 41×