Holli L. Telford v. Hon. David C. Nye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming, arguendo, that such a right exists and finding the appellant was afforded 14 due process
• concluding similar rule was not void for vagueness
• “Due process is not a rigid doctrine; rather, it calls for such procedural protections as are warranted by a particular situation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).