Holley v. Grigg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that, pursuant to section 450’s provision that decedent may designate a “person” to receive property, section 450 could not be used to validate decedent’s designation of multiple sons to receive investment account because singular included the plural

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).