Skip to main content
· 11/2/2004

Holley v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 604 S.E.2d 127
  • 44 Va. App. 228
  • 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s act of accelerating towards a police officer established sufficient evidence to support the inference that he sought to escape apprehension and intended to injure the police officer while doing so
  • “The evidence raises the sole inference that Holley intended to escape even if in so doing he had to drive his accelerating vehicle into the officer who stood before him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert J. Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.