Hollenbeck v. Household Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he 1987 IRA CD could not itself establish a qualified IRA because it did not contain the provisions required by I.R.C. § 408 (1987).”
• “Documents which are executed at different times, but in the course of the same transaction concerning the same subject matter, will be construed together to determine the intent of the parties to the contract.”
• “Documents which are executed at different times, but in the course of the same transaction concerning the same subject matter, will be construed together to determine the intent of the parties to the contract.”
• “Documents which are executed at different times, but in the course of the same transaction concerning the same subject matter, will be construed together to determine the intent of the parties to the contract.”
• construing multiple IRA documents together to determine intent of parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).