Hollenbeck v. Boivert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss where plaintiffs sufficiently alleged that ACS lacked probable cause to remove the children from their custody and alleged that no exigent circumstances existed to warrant removal
• noting defendants’ concession that “it is an unusual case where the question of qualified immunity can be resolved on a motion to dismiss”
• “The application of the Younger doctrine, however, is inappropriate where the litigant seeks money damages for an alleged violation of § 1983.”
• where upon consent of the parties, the neglect finding would be deemed vacated and the underlying petition dismissed if no motion was filed to vacate or modify the suspended judgment order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).