Skip to main content
· 3/21/1995

Hollar v. Myers (In Re Hollar)

Citations

  • 184 B.R. 243
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1260
  • 1995 WL 404159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well-settled that the filing of a motion for protective order does not automatically operate to stay a deposition or other discovery. Rather, a deponent is relieved of his or her duty to appear only if [a] court order is granted before the scheduled deposition.”
  • “It is well-settled that the filing of a motion for protective order does not automatically operate to stay a deposition or other discovery. Rather, a deponent is relieved of his or her duty to appear only if [al court order is granted before the scheduled deposition.”
  • same in the context of IRS tax sales

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William L. Stocks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.