Hollander v. Etymotic Research, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Court is persuaded by the law of other district courts holding that false marking claims are fraud-based claims subject to Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standards.”
• court “persuaded by the law of other district courts holding that false marking claims are fraud-based claims subject to Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standards”
• “Plaintiff’s allegations based on information and belief are insufficient under Rule 9(b) where Plaintiff has to set forth specific facts upon which such belief is reasonably based.”
• “The recent decisions to which Defendant refers have all been decided by courts in California, Texas and Illinois. These cases are at best persuasive authority which this Court is not obligated to follow.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).