Holland v. Zimmerman (In Re Zimmerman)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[b]ecause the discharge is a critical, if not the central, objective of an individual’s bankruptcy filing, arbitration of issues relating to dischargeability inherently conflicts with bankruptcy law”
• finding that the BAPCPA amendment expressed Congress’ intent that claims under § 523(a)(19) should be litigated in a non-bankruptcy forum
• recognizing the debtor’s interest in having dischargability and related issues “determined in one forum with particularized expertise to do so” (emphasis added)
• granting relief from stay to allow plaintiffs to prosecute a pending National Association of Securities Dealers4 arbitration and to stay the adversary proceeding seeking a determination of nondischargeabiliy under section 523(a)(19) because “[s]ection 523(a)(19
• \ Section 523(a)(19) expressly contemplates a postpetition determination of liability by a nonbankruptcy forum\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).