Holland v. White
Citations
- 120 Pa. 228
- 13 A. 782
- 1888 Pa. LEXIS 710
Syllabus
<p>1, A motion to quash a writ of foreign attachment is addressed to the discretion of the court and the exercise of that discretion is not renewable either on error or certiorari.</p> <p>2. The testimony read on the hearing of the motion is no part of the record and cannot be made such by a bill of exceptions, so as to enable this court to pass upon its sufficiency to justify the order.</p>
Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkey, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-07-02· cited 101×
- Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-01-03· cited 56×
- First National Bank of Omaha v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-01-04· cited 12×
- Schueck v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-10-13· cited 11×
- Appeal of LairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-16· cited 9×
- Moore v. Thomas Moore Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-01-02· cited 4×
- Lytle v. M'CuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-07-10· cited 4×
- Gilmore & Duffy v. DunleavySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-02-19· cited 1×
- Wolf v. DietzYork County Court of Common Pleas· 1927-10-24
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Holland v. White
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.